Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA15204 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 11 Oct 2001 22:29:30 +0100 From: <email@example.com> X-Mailer: talk21 v1.21 - http://talk21.btopenworld.com To: firstname.lastname@example.org X-Talk21Ref: none Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 22:20:46 BST Subject: Re: Memes in brain Message-Id: <20011011212209.BNVU29131.t21mta01-app.talk21.com@t21mtaV-lrs> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Cognitive science is not primarily about neurology. The focus is on
functionality. Leaving "neurological correlates" aside, the rest of
what you mention there sounds very "mind-like" to me. The supernatural
interpretation of "mind" is a straw man.
Straw men make the best opponents..... Actually, I wasn't proposing a 'supernatural' mind is required. Even if you apply functionalism, you'll still have problems teasing out your memes-as-units. What I'm driving at is: what is the unit of brain functionality? What is the unit of selection of brain functionality?
> As far as the mind goes, I think probably follow Dennett in not believing it
I'd be grateful for a reference on that.
http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/biblio.htm is the full list.
More precisely, I was referring to Dennett's treatment of the Cartesian theatre in "Consciouness Explained". However, that's mind-as-qualia, not mind-as-function - so basically Dennett does believe in minds as you define them.
So you think chess sets and universities don't really exist? Seems like
rather a useless usage of "real", to me.
Of course they do exist. But how could one count all the bricks in the university? One could count all the bricks in Brasenose College. It's a question of what's real enough to be scientifically analysable. (and no, it's not just a matter of counting all the bricks in all the colleges and summing them)
How about this: the trajectory of a missile can be accurately tracked
and recorded using the appropriate instrumentation. Is that trajectory
real, or not?
Yes, real and yes, scientifically analyzable. But is the mind (functional or otherwise) so straightforward?
talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the net at http://www.talk21.com
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 22:34:59 BST