Re: Memes inside brain

Date: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:23:08 BST

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Memes inside brain"

    Received: by id QAA08749 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:33:52 +0100
    From: <>
    X-Mailer: talk21 v1.21 -
    X-Talk21Ref: none
    Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:23:08 BST
    Subject: Re: Memes inside brain
    Message-Id: <>
    Precedence: bulk

    This message is for me connected to a problem I have been thinking about for
    some time: cultural inscription seems to have moved from oral, to written
    and more recently to audio-visual forms: Irish literature was for example in
    existence on moral-memory form before being written down. What has this
    evolution meant, caused or been caused by, from a memetic point of view?

    It would be easy to surmise that pre-writing narratives would have to be less reliably copied from one bardic generation to the next, and thus have a faster rate of evolution. But I'm not sure how correct that assumption is, as I understand that the Koranic scholars of parts of sub-Saharan Africa have preserved their memorised works virtually intact for probably about 400 years.
    Is there an accepted metric for quantifying the 'distance' between 2 texts? Given, say, 7 versions of a narrative epic, could a pairwise distance matrix be constructed? How would you handle cases where the plot was essentially the same, but the text extensively rewritten? And what about the converse, where the text was virtually identical but subtle changes alter the entire complexion of the narrative?

    talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the net at

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:44:50 BST