Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA08369 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 8 Oct 2001 13:32:32 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D077@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: A Test Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:47:16 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
I wiil offer some responses to this one.
<My sentences were reproducible, that's why they are memes.
> And that's what meme-theory is based on. That's all.>
Reproduction is not what meme theory is based on.
> > <"Commit suicide now." might be an instruction/suggestion but it is
> > > people do something. It is the persons brain which decides which
> > > memes to believe in, which to follow, which to let survive.>
> > No it doesn't because it's not a meme.
<Okay, so you think that "Commit suicide now." is not a meme?
> Ever heard about mass-suicide in sects? What if not this meme shared
> the members of the sect the moment they commit suicide?
> You think they all came randomly to the decision to commit suicide
> at the same time at the same place, ALL people at this place ?>
Wait a minute, wait a minute. Again your sentence_in and of
itself_is not a meme. As to cult suicides read my earlier posts on this
list, where we've discussed suicidal cults loads of times before. What
matters is context. You posting that sentence on this list doesn't have the
same potential impact that David Koresh writing it for his Davidian
followers when the FBI/ATF are outside the door.
> >> > replicate and transmit. Your words. My point.>
>> No people decide, or inadvertently transmit things to other
>> all the time- just like our conversation.
But transmitting things, is not transmitting memes. E.G. body
language conveys information but it is not intended to be copied/imitated.
>> They only become memes if a
>> person who has been transmitted to, decides, or inadvertently
passes it on
>> to someone else. (e.g. "I heard this really bad joke the other
<After this view a meme would require three persons. I write
> to you, you have to read it and tell it someone else so that it
> becomes a meme?
> I think you can see that this is not true.>
Why isn't this true? In order for it to be a meme, it has to be
cultural, in order for it to be cultural, it has to pass from at least one
person to another. Indeed, to be sure, that second person should pass it on
as well. Isn't it interesting that when most people talk about a culture,
they're talking about something that involves entire communities or
>> No they store specifi pieces of information
>> (obviously there are general areas of the brain for certain kinds
>> function), hence the idea of replication brain patterns (which
>> minds must be if that idea were true) must be false.
<I also agree that brain patterns don't get replicated. (Atleast in
> most cases!)>
Which is, IMHO, why memes in minds doesn't work, if memes are
supposed to be replicators. And that's my point.
<How do you want to know how information is stored in the brain?>
I'm sorry I don't understand the grammar of that question. What are
you asking ?
> > That's the point- the meme is the sentence itself, once someone
> > reproduces it.
<The sentence is already a meme before someone reproduces it,
> it CAN be reproduced.>
I disagree here. Every thought we have is not a meme regardless of
whether we tell anyone else about it. A meme is something that has been
communicated, transmitted to others, and persists.
>> You're missing the emergent properties that we're actually
>> talking about cultural transmission.
<You're talking big words about 'cultural transmission' but you
> describe how it exactly happens, outside the brain as you think.>
Nobody can describe exactly how it happens, whether that be in terms
of the artefact meme people, like me, OR the internal memeticists. Nobody's
got that far yet. The artefact approach at least has something tangible to
study- the artifacts themselves.
<Selection of memes is an important concept of meme-theory, so
> at the brain when it does select memes sure applies to memetics.
> Neuroscience can sure help, but i guess most neuroscientist haven't
> heard about memes yet. Or are there any works on "Memes and
> Neuroscience"? According to your and dereks point something like this
> could not even exist.>
Well, I'll leave that one to the people on the list who do work in
this, or related areas.
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:38:00 BST