Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA28167 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 3 Oct 2001 19:44:26 +0100 Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 00:57:05 +0100 To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: What/Who selects memes? Message-ID: <20011003005705.A824@ii01.org> References: <20011002185954.AAA16910@email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20011002185954.AAA16910@firstname.lastname@example.org>; from email@example.com on Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:59:00PM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:59:00PM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> On 10/02/01 14:16, Bill Spight said this-
> >It is certainly true that the selection need not be natural selection,
> >but I don't think that that was the claim.
> I equated the two. Mea culpa.
> I don't see any need to say 'selection' when one means 'choice' though.
It depends on whether one is taking an objective or subjective
perspective. "Selection" is objective, "choice" subjective.
-- "A prime source of meta-memes" -- inside information -- http://www.ii01.org/ Robin Faichney
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 19:49:41 BST