Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA22859 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:08:08 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D04B@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <email@example.com> To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: state of memes Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:56:13 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
I'd agree with your view that Iraq becoming a nuclear power is not something
to be welcomed, but there has been a kind of patriarchal attitude from
existing nuclear powers- "we're all right to have them- but you can't".
What that fails to acknowledge is that this position of exclusive access to
the only military technology that ensures a degree of genuine sovereignty
for a state, worries many nations, and not surprisingly the more aggressive
of these have persued, and still persue achieving this regardless of what
others may want.
Actually, I wanted to ask a couple of quick questions, one related, one not
so related. First, you've posted a few times about the attack on the towers
and the forces involved leading to the massive extent of destruction. One
discussion I've heard (amongst students I teach) is about whether the
hijackers intended to cause the towers to collapse, or whether they intended
only to kill themselves and those on the plane, with crashing into the
towers being more of a symbolic act. Do you think they would have worked
out how much damage they'd need to do to bring the towers down and cause the
most destruction, or where they more opportunists?
The reason this question comes up probably comes from UK experience of
terrorism, where warnings are given, or bombs are detonated late at night or
at weekends, such that the death toll is minimal. The terrorists in Norther
Ireland have a sense of public opinion- hence the 'mistake' at Omagh, where
20+ people died because the warnings were too late, and incorrect about the
bomb's location. That assumes of course that the US attackers were
similarly minded as the likes of the IRA, but the scale of this event
The other question, completely unrelated, is a quickie about this new theory
of the universe's origin, I've been reading about in New Scientist, the
ekpyrotic theory I believe it's called. Since you're the only physicist I
know, what's your view on this?
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 01 2001 - 12:15:19 BST