RE: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves

From: salice (
Date: Sat Sep 29 2001 - 21:33:03 BST

  • Next message: salice: "Re: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves"

    Received: by id TAA20114 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 19:40:18 +0100
    From: "salice" <>
    Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 20:33:03 +0000
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves
    In-reply-to: <>
    References: <>
    Message-Id: <>
    Precedence: bulk

    > Blackmore's). However, it is a hard to maintain the viewpoint
    > that memes are slaves of genes or vice versa, as the
    > co-evolution has somewhat flatted down or perhaps is slowly
    > reversing (now this *is* my hypothesis, posted some 2 months ago).

    well i agree.
    i just found it annoying reading things like meme were enemies of dna
    or they had a different independent evolution. i also believe that
    dna and memes influence each other but i don't think that they work
    against eachother.


    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 29 2001 - 19:45:30 BST