Re: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 22:05:18 BST

  • Next message: salice: "Re: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA18297 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:25:47 +0100
    Message-ID: <000b01c14861$5eeb6fc0$70a2bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <E15meHu-0000vY-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk><E15mg8c-0002e2-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk><000d01c14795$99018f40$33a0bed4@default> <1001691910.3bb49b06b3c7d@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    Subject: Re: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves
    Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:05:18 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Philip Jonkers <P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl>

    > Just for completeness' sake: what if memes move house from
    > the human brain to a meme-processing medium which can warrant
    > higher fecundity, frequency and fidelity. If such a medium
    > would emerge, memetic evolution would be faster and more profound
    > with this medium. Consequently, evolutionary pressures would
    > favor the latter medium. That is, the human brain would be
    > outclassed by this better meme-juggling entity.
    >
    > You might have guessed, I'm talking about (smart,AI) computers.
    > Susan Blackmore also makes some plausible predictions in
    > her Meme-Machine. So does a new meme-vehicle create a new
    > category or does it fall under the artifact category?

    Hi Philip,

    It never stops to amaze me to see how this idea pops up, but I get your
    drift.
    IMO, I already posted some thoughts about this subject, memes will
    evolve further, further in the way that they will stop needing genes.
    That in a sense they will tranfer themselves into a freaking container
    maintained by themselves. That will be no artifact, but something
    more likely like a no÷sphere, but without its genetic compounds.

    IMO, memetic evolution does not have to rely on genes, now yes,
    but in the future no !
    Memes will dispurse themselves from their biological container and
    will live their lives in a memosphere- like environment
    A kind of new model for virtual communication will do I suppose.
    Stopped to give the idea further thought...
    You have to think about memes in a complete new perspective, as
    one said " in an Derrida- like way "_ breaking with each context, and
    a life of their own...

    But, are we memetically up for this !?

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ( I am ,because we are) almost in Korea/ Japan

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 21:30:55 BST