Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA17968 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:41:20 +0100 From: "salice" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:36:07 +0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves In-reply-to: <001701c14804$f277efa0$9e06bed4@default> Message-Id: <E15n0eK-0004wFfirstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> I think more of a piece of art, created rightfully by a genes- holding
> called a human being, but in the sense that the piece of art ( a statue, a
> a book,...) brings out sentiment. Which will be different for anyone of us.
i see your point.
i've another question tho, why do people enjoy a certain piece of art
and others don't? why do they want to share it with others or put it
in a dustbin?
> A tree is not a meme, the sentiment, the knowlegde,... we extract from it
> by looking at it, by examining it,... is. And this we can propagate in many
> ways to other brains. In a way you can say that the tree is full of
> invisible memes and only specific visible just for the one who wants to see them.
a picture is just that. you can look at it and extract from it by
looking at it, by examining it. and this we can propagate in many
ways to other brains. in a way you can say that the picture is full
of invisible memes and only specific visible just for the one who
wants to see them.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 17:51:59 BST