Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA14596 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:27:17 +0100 Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 07:22:19 -0400 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010927112217.AAA19305@email@example.com> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Hi Robin Faichney -
>Your definition of "belief" is unique, and these statements are worthless.
Lots of definitions are useless. I try to define usage as well as
meaning, to attempt to come to some sort of understandable discourse.
My definition of belief comes from this following definition, and I only
refine it to the point of saying it requires no proof, which is, as you
say, more like 'faith'. So, substitute 'faith' - I have to substitute
'hood' for 'bonnet' dealing with you, and I do it simply and easily.
3. Something believed or accepted as true, especially a particular tenet
or a body of tenets accepted by a group of persons.
As for lying, well, I cannot have any surity about things. I'm always
reaching. The truth is not tangible for so many things.
I've only said, as you say, that true believers are not born, but made.
The only amplification I've attempted is an ethical one, that making such
believers is false to human nature.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 12:32:22 BST