Re: Dawkins was right all along

From: Robin Faichney (
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 15:47:44 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Getting to sleep"

    Received: by id QAA11780 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:16:56 +0100
    Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:47:44 +0100
    Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along
    Message-ID: <>
    References: <[]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <[]>; from on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:32:29AM -0400
    From: Robin Faichney <>
    Precedence: bulk

    On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:32:29AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > On 09/25/01 05:35, Robin Faichney said this-
    > >Those who believe in atheism
    > Ah, but one cannot believe in atheism. Atheism is an intentional stance.

    Care to explain that? Or will you rely on your usual trick of hiding
    behind gnomic utterance? (Note the disjunctive. And don't imagine that
    your "intentional stance" has anything of significance in common with
    that of Dennett. In fact it would appear to be quite the opposite.)

    Robin Faichney 
    "It is tempting to suppose that some concept of information could serve
    eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single theory," say
    Daniel Dennett and John Haugeland. The theory is here:

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:42:12 BST