Re: Mind vs. matter

From: Robin Faichney (
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 15:25:04 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Dawkins was right all along"

    Received: by id QAA11773 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:16:54 +0100
    Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:25:04 +0100
    Subject: Re: Mind vs. matter
    Message-ID: <>
    References: <> <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <>; from on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:05:41PM +0200
    From: Robin Faichney <>
    Precedence: bulk

    On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:05:41PM +0200, Philip Jonkers wrote:
    > >
    > > (<"The distinction between mind and matter is in the mind, not in
    > > matter.">
    > >
    > > Except that, without any matter there'd be no mind.)
    > Nice digression,
    > Regarding that, there's only (greasy) matter defining the
    > brain. The `mind' is the collection of thoughts no more,
    > its a creation of the brain. Like the self-plex, the mind
    > is a (in some people vast) nothing more than a memeplex...

    This is currently under discussion on the inside information list,
    and I'm not into "fighting on two fronts". If you'd like to take
    part, you can join the list at
    The archives are at">

    "The concept of information is the key that decodes mind, matter,
    meaning, consciousness..."
    Robin Faichney -- inside information --

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:36:13 BST