Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA05843 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:49:41 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:33:25 +0100 To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along Message-ID: <20010924183325.B752@ii01.org> References: <20010924124442.AAA23003@email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20010924124442.AAA23003@firstname.lastname@example.org>; from email@example.com on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:43:58AM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:43:58AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> On 09/24/01 05:55, Robin Faichney said this-
> >there are those who were never told about god.
> What a wonderful state to be in!
> But, would they start to make a story about a god?
> Thought experiment, unfortunately, but, in my thought experiment, they
-- Robin Faichney "It is tempting to suppose that some concept of information could serve eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single theory," say Daniel Dennett and John Haugeland. The theory is here: http://www.ii01.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 18:55:11 BST