Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA05635 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:44:37 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:44:12 +0100 To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along Message-ID: <20010924124412.A1700@ii01.org> References: <F27729cM3oryKFRJrzd000021cc@hotmail.com> <20010922095928.B939@ii01.org> <003901c143a4$5b8dc600$36a2bed4@default> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <003901c143a4$5b8dc600$36a2bed4@default>; from Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:22:16PM +0200 From: Robin Faichney <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:22:16PM +0200, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
> > It's very like the common response to terrorism: you don't study bad
> > things, you eliminate them!
> Hi Robin,
> Can 't agree on that, though !!
> But I suppose what you wrote was sarcastic !?
-- Robin Faichney "It is tempting to suppose that some concept of information could serve eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single theory," say Daniel Dennett and John Haugeland. The theory is here: http://www.ii01.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 16:49:44 BST