Re: Dawkins was right all along

From: Robin Faichney (
Date: Mon Sep 24 2001 - 12:44:12 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: Dawkins was right all along"

    Received: by id QAA05635 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:44:37 +0100
    Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:44:12 +0100
    Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along
    Message-ID: <>
    References: <> <> <003901c143a4$5b8dc600$36a2bed4@default>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <003901c143a4$5b8dc600$36a2bed4@default>; from on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:22:16PM +0200
    From: Robin Faichney <>
    Precedence: bulk

    On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 10:22:16PM +0200, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
    > > It's very like the common response to terrorism: you don't study bad
    > > things, you eliminate them!
    > Hi Robin,
    > Can 't agree on that, though !!
    > But I suppose what you wrote was sarcastic !?

    It was.

    Robin Faichney 
    "It is tempting to suppose that some concept of information could serve
    eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single theory," say
    Daniel Dennett and John Haugeland. The theory is here:

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 16:49:44 BST