Re: Dawkins was right all along

From: Robin Faichney (
Date: Mon Sep 24 2001 - 10:55:23 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: state of memes"

    Received: by id LAA04328 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:38:32 +0100
    Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:55:23 +0100
    Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along
    Message-ID: <>
    References: <[]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <[]>; from on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:11:18PM -0400
    From: Robin Faichney <>
    Precedence: bulk

    On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:11:18PM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > Hi Robin Faichney -
    > >Is there really no significant difference between (a) never having
    > >thought about something, and (b) thinking about it then deciding you
    > >don't believe in it?
    > The difference is in the way one is told about that thing in the first
    > place.

    Within the category of those who have never thought about the reality of
    god there are those who were never told about god. Yet you try to equate
    this condition with that of having thought about and rejected the concept.
    Which is ludicrous. Quite a good example, in fact, of the irrationality
    of militant atheism.

    "A prime source of meta-memes" -- inside information --
    Robin Faichney

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 12:25:00 BST