Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA13155 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:07:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:34:59 +0100 To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Why crash hijacked planes after we already *gave* them perfectly good rocket launchers? Message-ID: <20010921163459.A642@ii01.org> References: <20010921090158.A1065@ii01.org> <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>; from email@example.com on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:55:57AM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:55:57AM -0400, Aaron Agassi wrote:
> > Why send the same message time after time? Even those who were
> > sympathetic to what you wrote are now beginning to think you're something
> > of a loon. Others have no doubt about it.
> > Ob. memetics: repetition of a meme can reduce its appeal.
> I have revised, continually, from feedback.
Then you should have made that clear. I just saw the same first paragraph
over and over again. (Not that I'd necessarily have read any more even
if I'd known it was revised.)
-- "A prime source of meta-memes" -- inside information -- http://www.ii01.org/ Robin Faichney
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 21 2001 - 19:12:15 BST