RE: Dawkins View

From: Richard Brodie (
Date: Tue Sep 18 2001 - 16:36:46 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: Dawkins View"

    Received: by id QAA03817 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:42:23 +0100
    From: "Richard Brodie" <>
    To: <>
    Subject: RE: Dawkins View
    Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:36:46 -0700
    Message-ID: <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Importance: Normal
    Precedence: bulk

    Not Dawkins's best work. His fervent anti-religionism is coloring his point
    of view. Certainly belief in a paradisiacal afterlife is not necessary for
    suicide commandos. Animals have a built-in mechanism to sacrifice themselves
    for the good of their kin. All that is necessary is to co-opt that. Even the
    heroic passengers on UA93, who overpowered the hijackers and apparently
    crashed the plane, were driven by that mechanism.

    > It's just that the US does not seem to pay much attention
    > to the 64,000 dollar question: `WHY?'.

    I assure you the Government is well aware of how America's actions are
    perceived by various factions in the Middle East. But remember, these
    barbarians have attacked many other countries. There are some forces that it
    just doesn't make sense to appease. They must be destroyed.

    Richard Brodie

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 18 2001 - 16:47:17 BST