Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA08154 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 6 Sep 2001 20:33:34 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:31:09 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: TJ Olney <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: FW: England humour In-Reply-To: <F220w8k69RKLpgTFur2000084f8@hotmail.com> Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.33.0109061230090.227-100000@C157775-A.frndl1.wa.home.com> X-X-Sender: email@example.com Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Scott Chase wrote:
> Popularity is hardly a criterion of worth. Case in point...the rapid
> proliferation of "boy bands" such as Backstreet Boys and N'Sync branching
> from their primordial ancestor New Kids on the Block.
No, it is a criterion for making money, which most people equate with worth,
-- TJ Olney firstname.lastname@example.org Not all those who wander are lost.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 06 2001 - 20:38:27 BST