RE: Dawkins etc

From: Lawrence DeBivort (
Date: Sun Sep 02 2001 - 23:45:29 BST

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: Dawkins etc"

    Received: by id AAA22165 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 00:01:02 +0100
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <>
    To: <>
    Subject: RE: Dawkins etc
    Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 18:45:29 -0400
    Message-ID: <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Importance: Normal
    In-reply-to: <002501c133f4$bd9240c0$d387b2d1@teddace>
    Precedence: bulk

    I'm getting more and more lost, here.

    Ted, _how_ do organisms 'resonate' with previous similar forms?

    Thanks, - Lawrence

    > There are no independently existing lines of MR. It's not like
    > genes, which
    > are things in themselves. MR is simply the resonance of organisms or
    > naturally recurring forms with previous similar forms. It's not
    > as if there
    > are lines of gravity which, when crossed, give rise to new planets.
    > Ted

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 03 2001 - 00:08:22 BST