Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA20085 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Sat, 1 Sep 2001 17:36:24 +0100 Subject: RE: Logic Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 12:33:52 -0400 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010901163353.AAA29873@email@example.com> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Hi Lawrence DeBivort -
>How would you build a clock that would last 10,000 years? (It may throw
>some light on the longevity area of memes.)
Like that old adage, you don't make anyone an actual clock, you teach
them what time is. (Well, some people learn what time is, sometimes. You
can't teach all the people all of the time....)
And if society is determined enough, methods of telling time (hours and
minutes) will persevere, technology will mirror it (analog or digital),
artifacts will be made (watches).
Or they won't.
Time will tell.
And that's the space I took.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 01 2001 - 17:41:00 BST