Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA17943 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:03:11 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6CF7B@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: Some Light relief Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:37:07 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Amongst the explanations of the ten great plagues of Egypt, the most
difficult one is the last one- the death of the first born Egyptian kids,
with Israelites not affected.
Assuming this actually happened, as the researchers have done, they came up
with a fantastic solution. This does link to what you're asking BTW!
Basically they posited that the effects of previous plagues (of insects,
diseases and sandstorms) meant that the Egyptians stored their wheat etc. in
large underground chambers, possibly for much longer than normal. This
became a rife breeding ground for poisonous thingies (how annoying I can't
remember what they're called at all....) to grow on the stored wheat/grain.
The cultural tradition of the Egyptians was to feed the first born kids with
the "best" food, the most of it, and before everyone else- hence the first
born kids got most of the diseased crops (without anyone realising this, of
course). The Jews, on the other hand eating their unleven bread (as slaves
presumably they weren't allowed near the crops they were forced to work to
produce), and as such they didn't get ill.
I wonder if washing followed a similar path, of at one time a possibly
insightful connection being made between the survival of a group of people
when faced with an illness or whatever who washed and the deaths of those
who didn't, with that insight being lost in subsequent generations, whilst
the ritual was retained.
I have heard recently that Muslim prayer rituals owe a lot to the orthodoxy
of christian worship of the time, at least in that part of the world, so I
don't know how much their washing rituals owe to previous religions. Given
the current different between the largely symbolic baptism of most
christians (leaving aside the evangelicals who like doing the full body
soak), and the feet and hand washing of most muslims, it would be
interesting to see if there were any environmental factors that could
explain that difference.
I wonder also how come both Islam and Judaism retain traditions of food
preparation rituals- halal and kosher-(I used to wind up a Muslism friend of
mine with the persistent bad joke when passing any halal butcher 'That Hala
fella must be worth a bob or two'), whilst christianity doesn't. Kosher's
quite interesting because the list of right and wrong things is in Leviticus
(in the Bible) IIRC, and whilst it says not to eat creepy crawlies, it does
say you can eat crickets. I saw a programme about a Shoma (spelling?) in
London, the Jewish guys who go around checking that food is kosher. Very
BTW Chris, couldn't agree more on the GCSE pass rates thing. Good to see
also that the first cohort produced erudite intellectuals like yourself and
> From: Chris Taylor
> Reply To: email@example.com
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:57 pm
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Some Light relief
> > So, my education included a religious studies teacher who didn't believe
> > religion, and a biology teacher who didn't believe in evolution.
> Lol :)
> I was also in the first year of GCSE - I got some of the last 'O' levels
> going the previous autumn too - what puzzles me is that I only did half
> my French GCSE paper and got an A (hey look how well the kids do on
> these new exams - marvellous). What I don't get is how abilities can
> improve - I always thought that the national exam results were fitted to
> a curve that assumed the same profile of grades every year, but
> apparently that was wildly inaccurate. Apparently, pedagogical science
> is making vast strides...
> Back to the Asimov-inspired larks:
> Sorry, I've not gone bonkers (honest).
> My point was that if you're going to engineer some stability into a
> fairly anarchic version of humanity, you give them a codified set of
> behaviours that will allow reciprocal altruism (love your neighbour,
> don't kill people or nick stuff), protected by stranger exclusion (only
> trust subscribers of the religion), and importantly you give them some
> simple public hygiene tips (wash to avoid diseases like dysentery,
> cholera and typhoid) which are engineered into the memeplex as religious
> rites to keep them healthy and spreading the word; cleanliness is next
> to godliness, but why - the fairy tales you mention Phillip - good
> stories to engage simple folk, avoiding having to give courses in
> These days, the washing stuff is a stylised echo of the past, but why
> was it there at all? With or without my joke aliens seeding these ideas,
> how does washing get in there so regularly? The easy answer is that all
> these religions have a common root, which for arbitrary reasons
> contained a washing ritual, but again, why (considering that it took
> pasteur+ to work it out for us).
> And of course your new clan of converts will survive clashes with other
> groups much better if they have a super weapon like the ark of the
> Chris Taylor (email@example.com)
> http://bioinf.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 16:07:57 BST