Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA17547 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:35:52 +0100 Subject: RE: Misunderstood Cichlids Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:33:09 -0400 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010831123321.AAA2030@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 08/31/01 06:04, Vincent Campbell said this-
>Indeed, it seems to me that cichlids offer more problems for MR because of
>the rapid rate of speciation- where are all the past images of the multitude
>of new species to have appeared, particularly those that have emerged in
>recently isolated stretches of lake?
MR, like Photoshop, is constantly upgrading its selection of filters and
effects. And it has all those third party fellows (Yahweh, Mohammed,
Krishna, The Great Turtle, etc.) supplying even more.
I suspect it's more time for an infringement suit.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 13:43:12 BST