RE: Song of Myself

From: Vincent Campbell (
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 12:29:17 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Dawkins & Convergent Evolution- the final word (?)"

    Received: by id MAA07813 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:49:14 +0100
    Message-ID: <>
    From: Vincent Campbell <>
    To: "''" <>
    Subject: RE: Song of Myself
    Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:29:17 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Precedence: bulk

            <Sheldrake offers the phenomenon of "phantom limbs" as evidence for
    > fields. Unlike an inanimate object, the body wants to be whole. When an
    > arm is lost, the individual invariably reports that somehow it still seems
    > to be there. This makes perfect sense from the morphic point of view.
    > The
    > fields that regulate the structures of the body are arranged in a nested
    > hierarchy. Protein fields are nested within organelle fields, which are
    > nested within cell fields, which are nested within tissue fields, and so
    > on.
    > The field for an arm is part of a larger field embracing the rest of the
    > body. So it can't be removed just because the arm it regulated is gone.
    > This would explain the sense that the arm is still there in some way.>
            Do keep up Ted. Even those of us who follow this kind of stuff
    through a combination of science magazines, popular science books, and
    science TV shows know what's going on with phantom limbs. (See the popular
    work of Susan Greenfield, or the Indian guy who wrote what I think is called
    'Phantoms of the Brain'- I can't remember his name at the moment- I have
    posted it to the list before some time ago).

            Brain scans of people who suffer from phantom limb show very clearl
    patterns of brain activity. What happens is that the region of the brain
    that dealt with the signals being received by the lost limb, is co-opted by
    the brain for other uses, but there is a latent effect on the person. This
    is why, for example, you can touch, say a person's face, and they will feel
    their phantom limb as well as feel the touch on their fact.

            It's got nothing to to do whatsoever with weirdy fields, and
    everything to do with how the brain works.


    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 27 2001 - 12:54:02 BST