Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA21988 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:14:19 +0100 Subject: Re: "Newage sewage" Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:10:29 -0400 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010820231029.AAA29969@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Dace -
>Morphic resonance is based on form, not energy, so there couldn't be any
>energy loss in the transmission across time.
Besides the uselessness of all of your apologia, this one is especially
useless, if you'll pardon the tautology.
Because, like it or not, E=MC^2.
That's the way the universe is, laddie.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 00:18:49 BST