Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA25052 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:09:22 +0100 From: <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:10:13 -0500 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Evidence Message-ID: <3B777D55.15966.17180EA@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
> No he doesn't - he tells us a story without evidence.
Who says he has no evidence? He's not only conducted his own
experiments, but he draws on experiments conducted by
demonstrated morphic resonance purely by accident and then
results as anomolous.
And none of the purported evidence stands up to external review,
since it is composed solely of wishful interpretation.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 13 2001 - 13:16:22 BST