Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA14916 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 22:25:19 +0100 From: <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:29:20 -0500 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: Convergence + protein folding Message-ID: <3B740BE0.28064.146D567@localhost> In-reply-to: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAAEGICFAA.firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <3B7407CB.10957.136E62B@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 10 Aug 2001, at 17:24, Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
> > One argues logicallly based upon the facts; the alternative, to
> > argue illogically, always fails to produce a correct conclusion.
> > Stephen Jay Gould, who dismisses Sheldrake, is arguably a greater
> > evolutionary theorist than is Dawkins, and I'll just bet that Daniel
> > Dennett would dismiss him, too.
> I've been following this thread with interest, but may have missed a
> critical point: surely no one is saying that Dawkins accepts the
> notion of 'morphic resonance'?
Ted Dace has been invoking his name in an insinuendo fashion as
if to imply as much in so many words, although all he has quoted
is a passage where Dawkins seems to have difficulty accepting
that darwinian evolution can account for convergence.
> - Lawrence
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 23:04:49 BST