Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA14846 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 22:20:42 +0100 From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: RE: Convergence + protein folding Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:24:57 -0400 Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAAEGICFAA.email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3B7407CB.10957.136E62B@localhost> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
> One argues logicallly based upon the facts; the alternative, to
> argue illogically, always fails to produce a correct conclusion.
> Stephen Jay Gould, who dismisses Sheldrake, is arguably a
> greater evolutionary theorist than is Dawkins, and I'll just bet that
> Daniel Dennett would dismiss him, too.
I've been following this thread with interest, but may have missed a
critical point: surely no one is saying that Dawkins accepts the notion of
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 23:00:10 BST