Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA12808 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 06:56:09 +0100 Message-ID: <005f01c12160$e64bf840$6a24f4d8@teddace> From: "Dace" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <002501c120e6$765da4e0$b706bed4@default> Subject: Re: Logic Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:54:18 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Memes are indeed, of course associated with thought and IMO we
> > have to stop applying ' genetic- like ' explanations to describe the
> > memes themselves and the processes where they are involved in.
When he first coined the term, Dawkins located "memes" in the brain. If the
brain is reducible to genes, then memes are functions of genes. But if the
brain is informed by past, similar brains, then memes are patterns of
neurotransmission that follow habitually from previous, similar patterns.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 07:01:06 BST