Re: Convergence

From: Kenneth Van Oost (
Date: Thu Aug 09 2001 - 16:15:46 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Logic"

    Received: by id PAA10510 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:36:01 +0100
    Message-ID: <001d01c120e6$48353ce0$b706bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <>
    To: <>
    References: <3B708804.8677.7A8E14@localhost> <002b01c12046$1ab2a780$6787b2d1@teddace>
    Subject: Re: Convergence
    Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:15:46 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Precedence: bulk

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Dace <>
    To: <>
    Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:09 PM
    Subject: Convergence

    Hi dace,

    << I see your point here, but like I said yesterday in one of my posts,
    the number of differentations in nature are so enormous that sometimes
    two alternatives look almost simular.
    To conclude that this is caused by convergence is one way seeing things,
    it would prove that ' convergence ' is a possible natural alternative if
    nature ran out of choises, but for to say that it is a general apllication,
    you need more ' prove '.
    But I do agree on one thing, such examples exist and therefor they need
    our attention. They may prove to be one piece of the puzzle.



    ( I am, because we are) not converted at all

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 09 2001 - 15:40:28 BST