Re: MR Evidence

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Wed Aug 08 2001 - 21:20:14 BST

  • Next message: "Re: Convergence"

    Received: by id VAA08784 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 21:23:41 +0100
    Subject: Re: MR Evidence
    Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:20:14 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "memetics list" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    On 08/08/01 15:16, Dace said this-

    >He noted that the odds of
    >achieving this result were 10,000 to 1. Like Schwartz, Pickering concluded
    >that his results confirmed morphic resonance.

    Oh, by the Random Quanta!

    And just how in hell did he come up with a 10K to 1 chance?

    And just what in hell did he dismiss as causes before he determined this
    must be confirmation of 'morphic resonance'? (Tip o' the hat to Terry
    Pratchett, as we've been told.)

    These are little more than parlor tricks, and don't at all deserve the
    approbation of science.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 08 2001 - 21:28:03 BST