Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA08784 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Wed, 8 Aug 2001 21:23:41 +0100 Subject: Re: MR Evidence Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:20:14 -0400 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "memetics list" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010808202100.AAA15059@email@example.com> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On 08/08/01 15:16, Dace said this-
>He noted that the odds of
>achieving this result were 10,000 to 1. Like Schwartz, Pickering concluded
>that his results confirmed morphic resonance.
Oh, by the Random Quanta!
And just how in hell did he come up with a 10K to 1 chance?
And just what in hell did he dismiss as causes before he determined this
must be confirmation of 'morphic resonance'? (Tip o' the hat to Terry
Pratchett, as we've been told.)
These are little more than parlor tricks, and don't at all deserve the
approbation of science.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 08 2001 - 21:28:03 BST