Re: Logic

From: Philip Jonkers (
Date: Thu Jul 26 2001 - 15:46:00 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: Logic"

    Received: by id PAA13328 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:48:30 +0100
    From: Philip Jonkers <>
    X-Authentication-Warning: www-data set sender to using -f
    Subject: Re: Logic
    Message-ID: <>
    Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:46:00 +0200 (CEST)
    References: <>
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.5
    Precedence: bulk

    Philip said:
    > >Sorry, but no for you too Wade. Evolution might not be
    > >perfectly logical with respect to a perfect intelligent
    > >design, but it is logical the some degree nonetheless.
    > >Also it does `separate wheat from the chaff' if I correctly
    > >understand your niche. Natural selection means specific
    > >adaptation. A species adapts or perishes. During the competition
    > >between species only the fittest survive. Therefore, natural
    > >selection does function as a sieve to separate wheat from chaff.
    > >We humans wouldn't be around, being intelligent, on top of
    > >the food chain and all that, if it weren't for natural selection!
    > >Of all the macro-species, humans came out as winners in the
    > >rat-race called biological evolution.
    > >
    > >

    Scott said:
    > I suggest you start by reading Stephen Gould's _Wonderful Life_ and
    > follow
    > it up with an order of _Full House_.

    Then Philip goes:

    Sorry Scott, I don't have time for that. Why don't you
    enlighten me with whatever it is you want me to know.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 26 2001 - 15:52:37 BST