Re: Logic

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Thu Jul 26 2001 - 12:14:11 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Logic"

    Received: by id MAA12808 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:17:13 +0100
    Subject: Re: Logic
    Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:14:11 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Philip Jonkers -

    >Also it does `separate wheat from the chaff' if I correctly
    >understand your niche.

    What I meant was, it maintains useless entities, like appendixes. What we
    are is a build upon what came before, since it is a process.

    A good designer removes unnecessary things- starting from the design
    specs, not the present model.

    >Of all the macro-species, humans came out as winners in the
    >rat-race called biological evolution.

    But that's not proving anything. Yes, we're doing great in these present
    conditions, and we can do great in a handy lot of conditions, but, we're
    just as vulnerable as anything else, and a deal more vulnerable to
    environmental change than, say, ants. Mammals were a thin sort of niche,
    anyway, once upon a time.

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 26 2001 - 12:21:19 BST