Re: Memes and Archetypes

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Wed Jul 25 2001 - 21:11:03 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Memes and Archetypes"

    Received: by id VAA11725 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:14:33 +0100
    Subject: Re: Memes and Archetypes
    Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:11:03 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "memetics list" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    On 07/25/01 14:46, Robin Faichney said this-

    >What does it mean to say that a pattern "really exists"?

    Top of my head- that it can be mathematically described, and replicated
    in a model. That it be non-random.

    However, that becomes ludicrously impossible to prove, non-randomness....

    In nature, a set of genes will produce a species-identifiable life form.
    That would seem to be pattern. That lifeform exhibits definite behaviors
    upon certain stimulus. That would seem to be pattern. These behaviors are
    alterable by environment. That would also seem to be a pattern, and is
    the pattern-justification for culture in general, and thus memes in

    Memes are the shape of the webs we weave from one social entity to

    There is a pattern in the way we start and continue the web.

    There might also be a pattern in the way it ends up.

    But, I'm not so sure.

    The shape of the crystal, in gravityless space, is fixed by the structure
    of the molecule.

    We more need the descriptions and the patterns begun by environments to
    distill the patterns of the interaction of entities with it.

    Interference patterns.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 25 2001 - 21:18:39 BST