Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA02291 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:18:02 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745FB8@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <email@example.com> To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:39:54 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
Speculative memes aguably have found their niche in fiction (and
philosophy). In other words memes that don't relate in an immediately
utilitarian way to the real world around us, may thrive in appealing to our
imagination, hope etc. But they have to exist somewhere, to be able to
survive long enough to be transmitted to others, and thus they have to
retain some kind of form which will influence how, and even if, its
Look at Orwell's idea of Big Brother, technologically impossible in 1948,
getting ever more possible today, and through satellite surveillance and
CCTV (apparently the UK has proportionately the most CCTV cameras anywhere
in the world), but most explicitly referred to in a TV game show. Could
Orwell have ever foreseen his concept being turned into a form of
Fiction and philosophy allows us to consider 'what if...?' in a
transmittable form. I suppose one could call these 'speculative' memes, if
that's what you mean.
Incidentally, as an aside, I wanted to ask our US colleagues about Survivor,
which has completely bombed in the UK (I think due to the lack of
interactivity, and because it's a game that involves people being really
nasty to each other for money, which isn't very appealing to British
tastes). Anyway, I presume the challenges have been the same for the UK/US
versions. On one challenge, they all had to stand on a log out in the
water, with simply the person staying on longest winning. In the UK
version, three guys stood there for over 20 hours, the last two for 23
hours. I wondered how long the US contestants stood there for, assuming
they did the same challenge?
Big Brother 2 has been a ratings success, in stark contrast, and this time
genuine romance has blossomed, although again typically British perhaps
(unlike the Dutch, German and Spanish versions of the show) they have
constantly restrained themselves from having sex despite the fact they're
clearly gagging for it.
> From: Kenneth Van Oost
> Reply To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 10:37 am
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Vincent Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > For new memes to thrive, they can either exploit new niches (e.g.
> > jargon, or newer still, text messaging jargon), or they can simply be
> > adaptive than previously dominant memes. Like cats and dogs being
> > introduced into Australia and New Zealand, European and American
> > imperialism thrust new memes into different environments, and seem to
> > all the "flightless" memes wiping them out.
> Hi Vincent,
> Of course I agree with the notion that memes can either exploit or be
> But, thinking about it, and having Chris Taylor term ' resident ' in mind,
> I come up with the following.
> Couldn 't there be a third way by which memes thrive !?
> I mean, in a " speculative " way !?
> I mean by this all what is concealed by/ in the future, hope, utopia;
> thing what will become ' truth ', solution; everything what seems
> is bright of prospects, everything what can be exepted !
> The meme already thrives but is not yet determinated.
> And yes, already niches are occupied by it in the present but for all
> in the future too.
> And yes, adaptive forces are all already working by and on it, already
> present ( and future ) memes change by the meme's not yet deter-
> minated presence !?
> But IMO that will be not the same like pure and simple exploitation or
> simple adaptation.
> Exploitation of new niches seems absolute, determinated, what in the
> sense of a future/ speculative meme is not.
> Adaptation is absolute and determinated too, what in the sense of a
> speculative meme is not.
> There seems to be a semblance, there seems to be traces of non-
> absolutism, of non- determination in the context wherein we use the
> term speculative memes.
> Is this clear !?
> ( I am, because we are) thinking
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 20 2001 - 13:22:07 BST