Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA01978 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:58:55 +0100 Message-ID: <000f01c110ff$b6057380$4da2bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <email@example.com> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745FB2@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:37:33 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Vincent Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> For new memes to thrive, they can either exploit new niches (e.g. internet
> jargon, or newer still, text messaging jargon), or they can simply be more
> adaptive than previously dominant memes. Like cats and dogs being
> introduced into Australia and New Zealand, European and American
> imperialism thrust new memes into different environments, and seem to
> all the "flightless" memes wiping them out.
Of course I agree with the notion that memes can either exploit or be
But, thinking about it, and having Chris Taylor term ' resident ' in mind,
I come up with the following.
Couldn 't there be a third way by which memes thrive !?
I mean, in a " speculative " way !?
I mean by this all what is concealed by/ in the future, hope, utopia; every-
thing what will become ' truth ', solution; everything what seems promising,
is bright of prospects, everything what can be exepted !
The meme already thrives but is not yet determinated.
And yes, already niches are occupied by it in the present but for all
in the future too.
And yes, adaptive forces are all already working by and on it, already
present ( and future ) memes change by the meme's not yet deter-
minated presence !?
But IMO that will be not the same like pure and simple exploitation or
Exploitation of new niches seems absolute, determinated, what in the
sense of a future/ speculative meme is not.
Adaptation is absolute and determinated too, what in the sense of a
speculative meme is not.
There seems to be a semblance, there seems to be traces of non-
absolutism, of non- determination in the context wherein we use the
term speculative memes.
Is this clear !?
( I am, because we are) thinking
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 20 2001 - 10:03:02 BST