Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA29765 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Mon, 2 Jul 2001 10:03:41 +0100 Message-ID: <3B403839.A4BD76A6@bioinf.man.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 10:00:41 +0100 From: Chris Taylor <Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk> Organization: University of Manchester X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: sexual selection and memes References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745F20@inchna.stir.ac.uk> <003b01c0fb4c$4f3f2b00$02a2bed4@default> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> Just buzzin ' in here,
> Interesting topic !!
> Butta, doesn 't what you and Chris wrote mean that we can assume there
> are ' gender based memes ' !?
> I mean, can you assume a gender bias for memes !?
> After all, assuming that offspring receiving high male parental investment
> would mean ' receiving high male gender related memes ' does it not !?
> An old issue is looking us right in the face,...
Yeah - I think I'd have to agree there - well pointed out!
Chris Taylor (email@example.com)
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 02 2001 - 10:09:38 BST