Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA10941 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:13:22 +0100 Message-ID: <003b01c0fb4c$4f3f2b00$02a2bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745F20@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Subject: Re: sexual selection and memes Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:50:35 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Just buzzin ' in here,
Interesting topic !!
Butta, doesn 't what you and Chris wrote mean that we can assume there
are ' gender based memes ' !?
I mean, can you assume a gender bias for memes !?
After all, assuming that offspring receiving high male parental investment
would mean ' receiving high male gender related memes ' does it not !?
An old issue is looking us right in the face,...
----- Original Message -----
From: Vincent Campbell <email@example.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:20 PM
Subject: RE: sexual selection and memes
Can one assume, or does the study consider that offspring receiving high
male parental investment conduct high mpi themselves?
Maybe all they get is the appearance of high mpi from being well looked
after, and subsequently get the females regardless of how they then behave
I don't know if that problematises your idea or not....
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 22 2001 - 19:17:18 BST