Re: sexual selection and memes

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Tue Jun 19 2001 - 18:17:06 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: World Language Losses at a Glance"

    Received: by id SAA04886 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:20:50 +0100
    Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:17:06 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.388)
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    In-Reply-To: <>
    Subject: Re: sexual selection and memes
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Message-ID: <>
    Precedence: bulk

    On Tuesday, June 19, 2001, at 01:02 , Chris Taylor wrote:

    > I still think that a slightly more
    > fine-grained analysis has value.

    But I agree, you see- finely graining the analysis is where we might
    need the statistical referent of a meme, but, maybe not.

    So far, I'm still working on getting it into my head that memes are
    necessary and sufficient. And so far, I ain't convinced- and your
    example is one of the reasons I waver towards remaining unconvinced.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 19 2001 - 18:24:41 BST