Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA04852 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:05:30 +0100 Message-ID: <3B2F859A.C05BFDF1@bioinf.man.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:02:18 +0100 From: Chris Taylor <Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk> Organization: University of Manchester X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: sexual selection and memes References: <20010619165101.AAA8719@camailp.harvard.edu@net-31729> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Gene-environment interactions may also be precisely what memes are. No
> less, no more. Culture itself is a genetic interaction with the
> environment of nature and society.
> What else do we need to know, what other entities do we need to create?
> Memes are handy statistical referents in this scenario, but, they need
> only to be column headings in a categorization scheme.
Well, ish, but it's a bit general. I mean, everything is a
genotype/environment interaction, but I still think that a slightly more
fine-grained analysis has value.
Chris Taylor (email@example.com)
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 19 2001 - 18:09:19 BST