Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA22140 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:12:34 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745EFC@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <email@example.com> To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> Subject: RE: USA Today - interview with Gugatkin and de Waal on animal cul ture Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:58:58 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1] Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
<I'm lukewarm to cold onthe collapsing of social sciences to biology
> cal to arms of the Darwinizers against the so-called "standard social
> science model" bogeyperson. Fields of thought should enjoy some autonomy,
> though bridging should be explore, but not at the expense of one field.
> Would you want a bunch of sociobiologists telling you how you should be
> doing things or trivializing your field?>
I do share concerns about the trivializing of some disciplines by
others, and media studies has been knocked by pretty much everyone else at
one time or another. I'm not opposed to natural sciences informing what
social sciences do, though. I have bigger problems with disciplines, or
individuals within them, stampeding far beyond what is plausible, and
Wilson's stuff, for example, doesn't really consider the professional status
of other disciplines. At the end of the day, what does an entomologist
really know about social science, know matter how good an entomologist he
<I've been reading Steven Mithen's _The Prehistory of the Mind_
> and Hudson, Ltd. London) for something complementary to de Waal's book.
> just turned the corner early in the book where he introduces Haeckel's
> concept of recapitulation and the honeymoon may be over already ;-) More
> this as it develops.>
I think Joe posted a critique of the notion of animal tool use.
I've seen this book, and only stopped buying it (instead reading chunks in
the bookshop) because of the church analogy in his story of the development
of mind (not because it's a religious metaphor, simply because I thought it
was a bit cheesy). some nice stuff about culture though.
-- The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 12 2001 - 14:16:23 BST