Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA05342 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Wed, 9 May 2001 19:33:35 +0100 Subject: Re: Information Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 14:29:07 -0400 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010509182927.AAA5007@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 05/09/01 13:19, Robin Faichney said this-
>You obviously don't have to agree with me. The pressure you're feeling
>is the need to give good reasons for not doing so.
I doubt many people will agree with the following-
>>The best way to use any word is entirely a matter of opinion.
And I certainly don't.
And I think it is an extraordinary claim, and extraordinary claims
require extraordinary evidence.
The pressure you're feeling is the need to give good reasons for claiming
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 09 2001 - 19:37:13 BST