Re: Information

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Sun May 06 2001 - 21:50:05 BST

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #667"

    Received: by id VAA28607 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sun, 6 May 2001 21:54:13 +0100
    Subject: Re: Information
    Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 16:50:05 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    Hi Robin Faichney -

    >But for me, if its use allows
    >the laws of physics to be derived, then it's significant.

    I don't think I'm any too entrenched here to mention that something has
    to be _used_ (that is, apprehended and understood and engaged) first
    (regardless of when or how anything is derived) to then be significant....

    And, unless I'm horribly mistaken, we're almost over the semantic butte.

    (No, that's a sacred burial mound.)

    (Well, it sure is purty....)

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 21:57:50 BST