Re: Information

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Fri May 04 2001 - 13:52:53 BST

  • Next message: "Re: Information"

    Received: by id NAA24510 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Fri, 4 May 2001 13:57:20 +0100
    Subject: Re: Information
    Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:52:53 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "memetics list" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    On 05/04/01 05:30, Robin Faichney said this-

    >I'm talking about the information that's
    >intrinsic to every physical system, that Frieden and colleagues have used
    >*successfully* to derive the laws of physics.

    And, sure, I can understand that. But, if this intrinsic (is this
    Fisher?) information is _not_ derived, and the law of physics issued
    therefrom, of what significance is it, or could it possibly have?

    Significance- 2. A meaning that is expressed.

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 04 2001 - 14:02:24 BST