Re: Information

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 20:56:02 BST

  • Next message: wilkins: "Re: Selection of scientific theories - metascientific experiment"

    Received: by id VAA22930 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Thu, 3 May 2001 21:00:25 +0100
    Subject: Re: Information
    Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 15:56:02 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "memetics list" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    On 05/03/01 13:52, Robin Faichney said this-

    >> I agree that until the information is _derived_ from whatever system that
    >> process is resident within, it is without value and irrelevant.
    >> That is far from saying it is not there.
    >Considering the following quote from the same article, do you still
    >insist that intrinsic information (J) is of no significance?

    If having no derivation is of no significance, and I think that's fair to
    say, then, yes. Of what significance is something that no-one knows?

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 03 2001 - 21:03:59 BST