Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA22726 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Thu, 3 May 2001 19:37:33 +0100 Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 18:48:45 +0100 To: email@example.com Subject: Re: Information Message-ID: <20010503184845.B1419@ii01.org> References: <20010502183444.AAA19358@firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20010502183444.AAA19358@email@example.com>; from firstname.lastname@example.org on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:34:33PM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <email@example.com> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:34:33PM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> On 05/02/01 12:54, Robin Faichney said this-
> >You really need to read
> >before you say any more about this.
> Happy to comply-
> >"Frieden's shown that a host of what used to be
> > regarded as fundamental equations of physics are
> > actually capable of derivation," says Hawkes.
> And I'm happy to agree with this- especially since he used 'derivation'
> and not 'generate'....
> I remit - "If someone does generate laws of physics, they are making them
> I think Frieden is saying the same thing.
I'm sorry, I really don't much care about your semantic hangups.
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 03 2001 - 19:45:07 BST