Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA19473 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Wed, 2 May 2001 15:42:54 +0100 Subject: Re: Information Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 10:38:18 -0400 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010502143829.AAA614@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 05/02/01 10:05, Robin Faichney said this-
>>It's not information, to me, until someone can use it.
>Isn't the information in every physical thing just waiting to be used?
I'm not, at the moment, wanting to make that semantic gap irrelevant.
Information about something is hardly relevant _until_ it _can_ be used,
and for all purposes and intent, has no existence until it _is_ used.
>it is our attempt to minimise these differences that
>generates the laws of physics
I have not seen one law of physics that we have generated.
>I'm not making this up, you know! :-)
If someone does generate laws of physics, they are making them up.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 02 2001 - 15:49:54 BST