Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA13833 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:53:26 +0100 Subject: Re: Information Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:48:58 -0400 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "memetics list" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010430134908.AAA12347@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 04/30/01 07:56, Robin Faichney said this-
>And you sound paranoid.
See? I'm far from that.
>My point was about the primacy of patterns.
Are Dennett's algorithms 'patterns' though?
Is the tipping point a pattern?
My little dictionary has - 5. A consistent, characteristic form, style,
I'm enjoying the discussion about patterns, and I've bitten my tongue a
few times, but I haven't said anything because I'm still not sure, yet
again, about nomenclature.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 14:56:53 BST