Re: Information

From: Robin Faichney (
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 18:59:36 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science"

    Received: by id TAA11929 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:08:07 +0100
    Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:59:36 +0100
    Subject: Re: Information
    Message-ID: <>
    References: <[]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <[]>; from on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:26:15AM -0400
    From: Robin Faichney <>
    Precedence: bulk

    On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:26:15AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > Hi Robin Faichney -
    > >It's just as well that (some) patterns are real, as they are all that
    > >science has to go on!
    > That sort of makes science sound like it ain't got much, whereas in fact
    > it is the only thing with _any_ of it.

    I have no interest in putting down science. If you feel that sounds
    like science ain't got much, that's your problem, not mine. But it's
    worth noting that science is not all that's worth doing.

    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 29 2001 - 19:11:32 BST