Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA08393 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:44:37 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [126.96.36.199] From: "Scott Chase" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:40:20 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: <F227sVxONvzyJxArGvn00001291@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2001 20:40:21.0173 (UTC) FILETIME=[47028E50:01C0CF5A] Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
>From: Vincent Campbell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>To: "'email@example.com'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:35:56 +0100
> <Without religion you wouldn't have Bach's music.>
> I don't think Bach makes up for the Inquisition.
Now there's a contrast. We have the gamut from the wondrous beauty of
religious art and architecture to the horrid application of religious dogma.
Mostly, I'd assume, religious activity occupies points betwixt the two
extremes, but some of the music (Gregorian and Buddhist chants for example)
and artistic productions (stained glass, statues and temples) should be
given their due.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 21:48:00 BST