Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA27980 (8.6.9/5.3[ref firstname.lastname@example.org] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from email@example.com); Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:53:26 +0100 Subject: RE: memes- remember them? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:49:10 -0400 x-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <email@example.com> To: "memetics list" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010424124937.AAA20026@email@example.com> Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: email@example.com
On 04/24/01 04:59, Vincent Campbell said this-
>Calling von Daniken a fraud might lead to legal action, if he saw it.
He's certainly a loonie. Fraud implies illicit gains and a motivated
activity, so, legally, he might not be, but then again, he may have
started some businesses that could be called fraudulent.
Just because a guy is wrong don't necessarily make him a fraud.
Look at me, well, a tenth of the time....
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 24 2001 - 14:00:26 BST