RE: memes- remember them?

From: Wade T.Smith (
Date: Tue Apr 24 2001 - 13:49:10 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Levels of explanation (was Re: Determinism)"

    Received: by id NAA27980 (8.6.9/5.3[ref] for from; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:53:26 +0100
    Subject: RE: memes- remember them?
    Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:49:10 -0400
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <>
    To: "memetics list" <>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <[]>
    Precedence: bulk

    On 04/24/01 04:59, Vincent Campbell said this-

    >Calling von Daniken a fraud might lead to legal action, if he saw it.

    He's certainly a loonie. Fraud implies illicit gains and a motivated
    activity, so, legally, he might not be, but then again, he may have
    started some businesses that could be called fraudulent.

    Just because a guy is wrong don't necessarily make him a fraud.

    Look at me, well, a tenth of the time....

    - Wade

    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 24 2001 - 14:00:26 BST