Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA22945 (8.6.9/5.3[ref email@example.com] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from firstname.lastname@example.org); Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:57:37 +0100 Subject: Re: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 16:53:48 -0400 x-sender: email@example.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <email@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010422205348.AAA22623@firstname.lastname@example.org> Sender: email@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Hi Trupeljak Ozren -
>>Science will not move without evidence for perception.
>What does that mean?
Mechanisms, mostly. Proofs.
>As for anecdotes, beliefs and other fictions, try talking to a good
'Creationist researcher' is, of course, an oxymoron. They are literally
deniers of facts, and not discoverers of any.
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 22 2001 - 22:00:54 BST